🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.