🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Officials, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a growing group of countries are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that smartphones and networks are "taking away our children's childhood". The policy is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to enact a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a advisory resolution supporting a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. Although it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a useful first step," commented the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "supported by strong data".

Previously, support built behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. An organization established by the relatives of a girl who was lost after encountering dangerous platform posts argues that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to build products and services that are safe and age appropriate for children," stated a prominent peer.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, action is primarily unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding parental consent for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from various individuals to mimic the Australian example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Apart from Europe and the US, additional states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, international bodies take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even backfire". The agency points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion continues, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers globally are increasingly content to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.